Thursday, April 30, 2009
Southern Skywatch May 2009 edition is now up!
The May edition of Southern Skywatch is now up. There is a close approach of Venus, the Moon and Mars. The eta Aquariid meteor shower is on May 6. Also there is a "blue" last Quarter Moon.
Labels: southern skywatch
Half a Blue Moon is better than no Blue Moon.
Yet, we are (sort of) surprised when we get two Full Moons in one month. Because the time from Phase to Phase (eg Full Moon to Full Moon) is 29.4 days, and the average length of a month is 30.4 days, any lunar phase will be roughly a day earlier in the following month (except the February to March roll-over, for obvious reasons). So the Lunar phases drift through the months.
For example, a Full Moon that starts on the 1st of a given month it will take roughly 30 months (or 2.5 years) to occur on the 1st again, (again, this get messed up a bit by 28 day February).
At least part of our surprise is due to the vast majority of us not remembering the previous blue moons 2.5 years in the past (hey, I can’t remember what I had for breakfast, so remembering that is a bit of an ask), and partly our disinclination to remember Solar and Lunar system data and do long division in our heads.
We express that surprise with a special name for the second of two Full Moons that occur in the same month, a "Blue Moon", this has come to be synonymous with something occurring rarely (Once in a Blue Moon). Although, at an average of once every 2.5 years it’s not that rare.
But why don’t we have a special name for the second of two First Quarter Moons? Or for two consecutive New Moons, or Last Quarter Moons in a month? After all, they will be as rare as two consecutive Full Moons (roughly every 2.5 years). In part, it’s due to the importance of the Moon in our lives, or for those of us in the industrialised world, the lives of our grandparents. In the days before artificial lighting was wide spread and of high quality, the light of the Full Moon was needed if you wanted to hold an event at night. The Full Moon was a signpost to agricultural activities (Harvest Moon anyone), and a visible calendar. So of course people will take notice when two Full Moons occur in a month.
When two New Moons occur in a month, who but the astronomers will know or care? Likewise for two Last Quarter Moons, unless you are an astronomer, fisherperson or a farmer you are not likely to be up early enough to see a Last Quarter Moon, let alone realise that there are two of them in a month. But First Quarter Moons, we all can see them, and for many of us they are companions on our way home from work. True, the impact of Last Quarter Moons on our collective psyche is less (notice how in movies or paintings or cartoons the Moon is almost always Full, or a narrow crescent, First Quarter Moons feature very rarely), but still as an easily observable Moon Phase I think we should have a name for them.
How about a “Half-Blue” Moon? Any suggestions?
Dates of “Blue Moons”, ie months were two of any given lunar phase fall in the same month (not just two full Moons in a month the standard definition). Note that every year has at least one “Blue Moon” of some type.
 Because we run a solar calendar, and the Lunar “year” is shorter than the solar one. People seem to object to the seasons moving through the year more than the Lunar phases moving through the year. Also, rather inconveniently the solar year is 365.24 days long, making it impossible to design a stable calendar of integer day length, hence months with different days in them and leap years.
 This usage is actually due to a writer from Sky & Telescope, earlier usages seem to have been “the third of four full moons in 3 months”.
The Jewel Box
I took this image using GRAS-13 from Global Rent-a-Scope. Nice.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Unexpected Rainbows (Part 4)
So we went to Victor Harbour on the weekend, during the biggest wet in South Australia for a long time. In a brief break between downpours, I went for a walk to Granite Island (penguin webcam here), as I walked across the causeway, a brief shower swept across and as it passed, this gorgeous rainbow appeared for a short time. This rainbow is somewhat unusual, as you can clearly see it in the foreground of the ocean. Often, if the rainbow reaches to the ground, it appears to merge into the ground (hence the "pot of gold" at the end of the rainbow legends). But it was very clear that the rainbow was floating in mid air, above the sea, and it shows in this image (click to embiggen). Shortly after, the rainbow faded away to nothing. However, I was surprised by more rainbows during that weekend.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Carnival of Space #100 is here.
Labels: carnival of space
Monday, April 27, 2009
It looks like ....
It calmed down a bit this afternoon. I took micronephew for a walk under a lowering sky. A fantastic chip of Moon played peekaboo with the clouds. Mercury could not be seen in the confusion of clouds, but micronephew giggled and pointed at the crescent Moon, so that didn't matter.
Sunday, April 26, 2009
The Moon and Mercury, April 27 2009.
Monday sees the thin crescent moon not far from Mercury. Unfortunately, both are very close to the horizon, and you will need a level horizon clear of obstacles too see them.
Dawn, April 25 2009.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Best Takedown of the
2102 2012 nonsense ever ...
Friday, April 24, 2009
A Clouded Moon
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Galileos’ DNA, and different forms of Blindness
I’m writing this post especially for the 100th Carnival of Space, because it involves the 400th anniversary of Galileo looking through his telescope, so the post is a double 00 double whammy. It also combines my love of astronomy and science history with my love of biology.
Galileo's 1616 drawing of Saturn
The article it is based on is old news though. Italian Scientists are trying to recover DNA from Galileo’s remains. Amongst other things they wanted to understand was the source of Galileo’s blindness and why he saw Saturn as an object with “ears”. The first is a reasonable question, although probably not answerable. The second question is not, as a bit of thought (and a bit of history) would reveal.
What about Galileo’s blindness? Surely he went blind from observing the Sun through his telescope. Well, that’s a very common perception, but no he didn’t. Galileo observed sunspots from around 1611 to 1614. However, Galileo didn’t become blind until he was 68, nearly 30 years later. Furthermore, he became blind in both eyes. Even if you take the line that subclinical photodamage to his eyes developed progressively into blindness, this should have only occurred in the dominant eye he used for observation not both.
Now, for a dramatic example of what happens when you look at the sun directly through a telescope; look at this video...nasty isn’t it. Why didn’t Galileo’s eye boil? Firstly, he observed only very close to sunset, when the Sun was dimmed by atmospheric haze. That, and the optics of his telescope dimmed the image of the Sun as well. Secondly, while he did some direct telescopic observations (again, around sunset when the suns image was dim), during 1612 he started using a projection technique, so the period when he was directly observing the Sun was short.
So, if we want to find out why Galileo went blind what sort of diseases should we be looking for? Well, they have to be diseases that occur relatively late in life, and cause blindness in both eyes. This leaves out the majority of mitochondrial gene diseases, which tend to occur in early life. This is a bad thing for our researchers. Galileo’s body wasn’t preserved with future DNA specialists in mind, so his body has undergone substantial decomposition. Which means the DNA in the nuclei of his body’s cells have decayed too, and been chopped up into little fragments. This is not such a big problem for mitochondrial DNA, that gets chopped up too, but there are lots of copies of mitochondrial DNA (as there are lots of mitochondria, the powerhouses of the cell) so it's more likley you will recover enough fragments to make sense of the genes. The first DNA recovered from Neanderthal remains was mitochondrial DNA for example.
So, with Galileo’s nuclear DNA in little fragments, finding disease genes is going to be hard. What sorts of blindness that occur in both eyes in old age are known to be associated with genetic defects? Macular Degeneration is the commonest form of blindness in old age in western countries, and is associated with genetic defects. However, there are a wide range of defects associated with this disease, they don’t all occur in the same individual (or even in all diseased individuals), and require environmental interaction. So, if Galileo had Macular Degeneration, your have to scrummage through huge numbers of gene fragments looking for disease genes which may not even be there.
Worse still, Macular Degeneration is probably not the condition Galileo had; it doesn’t really fit the description given of Galileo’s disease. There have been a couple of proposals, one is a combination of glaucoma and cataracts which is still quite common, another is he had bilateral iridocyclitis due to his rheumatoid disease. Neither of these diseases has strong genetic linkage, so any attempt to diagnose these causes of Galileo’s blindness from his DNA would be marginal at best, even if Galileo’s DNA wasn’t in lots of itty bitty hard to assemble fragments.
So diagnosing Galileo’s blindness is a pretty marginal ask, even if we had his intact DNA. What about Galileo’s views of Saturn? Galileo wrote to Kepler in code, after his observations of Saturn, "I have observed the highest planet tri-form." Galileo saw Saturn as a triple planet, or sometimes as a planet with “ears”. Why didn’t he see the rings as rings, was his observations in 1610 (before he did any solar observing) and indication of incipient eye disease, which we could pick up browsing through his genes?
Huygens diagrams of Saturn.
We don’t need genetics to explain this. Galileo’s strongest telescope was only 30x magnification, and it’s optics, although finer than almost anyone else’s, were no where near modern standards. Furthermore, no one had experience of ringed worlds. Galileo had to struggle to interpret what he saw through his telescope with no analogues to guide him. If you were to look through a 30x scope today, the rings of Saturn are not particularly obvious, but because we know they are rings, it is easy for us to understand what we see. Another reason to suppose we don’t need a genetic explanation is that no one else could make out Saturn’s rings either; people saw a multitude of bizarre shapes (see Christian Huygens drawings left). So either there was an epidemic of genetic-induced eye diseases making astronomers incapable of seeing Saturn’s rings, or a more mundane explanation is responsible; imperfect telescopes and the sheer unanticipated nature of the observations. It took a combination of better telescopes and systematic observation to discover Saturn was a ringed world.
Galileo revolutionized the world of astronomy, and his blindness was a tragic denouement to a career based around observation. Our curiosity drives us to understand what disease it was that caused it, and I wish the researchers well, but I suspect they will find nothing concrete. But to try an explain Galileo’s visions of Saturn by genetic disease is a fools errand, and one that ironically flies in the face of Galileo’s own commitment to observation. This, the need to find explanations in genes, is a different sort of blindness.
My First Image of C/2009 G1
This is a very special comet, as it is the few comets found by the stereohunter community that can be seen by Earth-bound telescopes (mostly the are Kreutz sungrazers). I can remember the excitement after Ruan found the faint object moving in the stereo images, as the stereohunters eliminated candiate after candiate until it was clear this was a new object.
If you don't have a telescope, you can enjoy C2009 G1 Ruan in Celestia or Stellarium.
Shortly after the image above was taken, the clud came over the Moorook telescope site (typical). Image is a 2 minute exposure using scope G-15.
Carnival of Space #99 is here.
Labels: carnival of space
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Welcome, Gliese 581e (Oh, Yeah, Gliese 581d IS in the habitable zone)
The Gliese 581 system delivers again. Giese 581 is a red dwarf star 20.4 light years away that until recently boasted the lightest extrasolar planet ever found. At 5 Earth masses, Gliese 581c was not exactly a second Earth, but it and 7 Earth mass Gliese 581d captured the worlds imagination as they seemed to be in the habitable zone of their parent star, where liquid water can exist.
Now the smallest mass planet ever has been discovered around Gliese 581, a 1.9 mass planet Gliese 581e, presumably rocky, that screams around Gliese 581 in a little over three days. At a mere 0.03 Astronomical Units from its star, Gliese 581e is a Mercury-like world, baking in the close embrace of the Red Dwarf.
Importantly, the orbit for Gliese 581d has been refined too. It is now definitely within the habitable zone of its star. Gliese 581d is likely very unlike Earth, and it and Gliese 581c are probably water worlds. The refinement of the orbit of 581d means it is very-likely covered in liquid water, when the planet was first described it seemed more likely it would be an ice world (but Gliese 581c is more likely to be Venus-like).
Unfortunately, even though Gliese 581 is so close that we can almost touch it, astronomically speaking, we won't be travelling there for a while. You can go there virtually though if you have the 3D space rending program Celestia, I have made an ssc file for the Gliese 581 system. If you have Celestia 1.5 and above, the program already comes with Gliese 591b, c and d (you will have to comment b and c out in my file, and comment out d in the extrasolar.ssc file as it has the old orbit).
Download the file Wolf_562.ssc (the alternate name for Gliese 581) and put it in your Celestia extras folder and go exploring.
For the original ESO press release go here. For a PDF of the discovery paper go here. And a Nature News commentary is here.
Naturally the blogosphere has already caught on. Here's Stuart's take, Centauri Dreams, Dynamics of Cats, Starts with a Bang (and his update here), Science After Suneclipse on how long it would take to get to Gliese 581 and the Questionable Authority on what this means for finding alien civilizations (and how much you would weigh on Gliese 581d).
Venus Campaign 2009
Of course, this means getting up at 5:30 in the morning on successive mornings for a few months, so it can be a bit of a pain. Still, the morning sky is lovely at the moment, so it's worthwhile.
I used my old 4" scope for the imaging. Why? Because the drive motor of Don, the 8" scope, prevents it from going down close to the horizon.
Here's an image of the crescent Moon, to go with crescent Venus.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Venus, Mars and the Crescent Moon, April 22-23.
On Wednesday April 22 and Thursday April 23 the crescent Moon is near the pairing of Venus and Mars. This will look very nice indeed, especially on the 23rd, when the very thin crescent Moon is just under the very thin crescent Venus.
Unlike North America, Australia, New Zealand, Africa and South-East Asia don't see the Moon pass in front of Venus (although if you are in South America, you will see Venus spectacularly close to the Moon), but the triangle Venus forms with the Moon and Mars is pretty nice (in Africa its better on the 22nd than on the 23rd.
The Lyrid meteor shower peaks on the 23rd. The Lyrids produce a small number of meteors, and in the Southern hemisphere, the radiant is pretty close to the horizon (near the bright, blue white star Vega, almost due north), so rates will be lower still from our point of view, but if you are up and observing, there may well be the occasional meteor to enliven the morning sky. As well, you can watch for satellites. and look at Jupiter's moons through binoculars.
A fairly good way to spend the morning overall.
McNaught amongst the Galaxies
Monday, April 20, 2009
Moon, Jupiter, Venus and Mars.
Keep on watching. Venus comes closer to Mars, and on the 22nd and 23rd, the thin crescent Moon, Venus and Mars are close together.
I could see Jupiter 15 minutes after sunrise, but by 40 minutes after, it was difficult to see with thin high cloud interfering. Without the Moon to guide me, I would have had no hope of seeing it. Venus was dead easy to see until the cloud went over it.
Had a look at Venus through the 4" scope, very, very thin crescent, very beautiful. Have to drage the imager out and take some photos.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Stereo Spacecraft in Celestia
The Stereo spacecraft are slowly drifting in their orbit, so you need to update the elements periodically. I use the Horizons web interface to generate orbital elements for the spacecraft. Change the Ephemeris type to "orbital elements" and the target body to "stereo spacraft-A" or "stereo spacraft-B". I use these models to give me an idea what is in the field of view of the stereo spacecraft.
Epoch 2454926.500000000 # = A.D. 2009-Apr-05 00:00:00.0000
Epoch 2454926.500000000 #= A.D. 2009-Apr-05 00:00:00.0000
Labels: Stereo Satellite
Friday, April 17, 2009
Jupiter Meets the Moon, April 20 2009
The morning of Monday, April 20 will be rather nice with the Crescent Moon just below Jupiter and Mars and Venus below it. With Jupiter a mere 3 fingerwidths from the Moon, this is another opportunity to try and see Jupiter in the daytime (or at least shortly after sunrise). Locate the Moon and then look up and to the right a little, you may (just) see a bright dot that is Jupiter (and always make sure the Sun is hidden behind something very solid so as to protect your eyesight).
Keep watching, on April 22 and 23 the narrowing crescent is close to Venus and Mars (which are also close) to form a very nice triangle. Also keep an eye out for Irridium Flares. You may even see a Lyrid meteor or two while you watch.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Cosmic Diary - Why Star Formation?
Like humans and other animals, stars have a life cycle. But how are they "born"? Why do they form in the way that they do, and how does this influence their lives? How important is gravity, or what they are made of, or where they are created? Until relatively recently these were questions it seemed we had little hope of answering, but thanks to modern scientific technology and techniques, the secrets of stars can be revealed to all.
Labels: International Year of Astronomy
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Tycho Brahe gets a Shave
The starting point of the old post was Mr Wallace’s contention:
I have a counter example, from science, fully described here, where Occam's razor fails. The idea that the "simplest explanation is probably right" was falsified when Tycho Bryhe [sic] rejected heliocentricism for geocentricism, based on his analysis of the best available data.Once again, I must emphasise that Occam’s razor is not the simplest explanation is probably right, but let’s pick up on Mr. Wallace’s comments. I’m going to do this slightly out of order, so as to address particular issues that arise from the quotes more logically
There were three systems, Copernicus, classical Ptolemaic, and neo-Ptolemaic (or Tycho's). Both Ptolemy's and Tycho's could be accurately described as geocentricism. I just want to clarify that I don't think I ever claimed--and I certainly never intended to claim--that Tycho held a purely Ptolemaic view of the solar system. He held a geocentric view, more consistent with Ptolemy's than Copernicus's (though Kepler's was arguably more akin to Copernicus's than Tycho's was to Ptolemy's.)This is so very, very wrong. Tycho’s system was not a neo-Ptolemaic system, as I describe below, Tycho explicitly rejected the Ptolemaic system based on observational evidence. Tycho accepted most of Copernicus’s system, but balked at a moveable Earth and produced a Heliocentric-geocentric system (not a geocentric system, for another animation of the respective systems see here). Indeed it is an “inverted Copernican” system, basically a remapping of the Copernican system into a reference frame centred on Earth. Tycho’s system contains nothing of Ptolemy; there are no equants, no great epicycles and so on. I’ll emphasise that again, Tycho’s system was not a re-jigging of Ptolemy, it was an inversion of Copernicus’s system.
The only point of similarity between Ptolemy’s system and Tycho’s system was the Earth was immobile in both systems, but in Tycho’s, everything but the Moon rotated around the Sun. Again, the key features of Ptolemy’s system, the equant and the great epicycles were absent from Tycho’s formulation. This may seem like mere pettifoggery, after all, both Ptolemy and Tycho had the Earth as the centre of the solar system, but Ptolemy’s system was not just “everything goes around the Earth”. Tycho had explicitly rejected the Ptolemaic system, all the key features of the Ptolemaic system, taken all the planets and placed them around the Sun and grounded his system on a reformulation of the Copernican system.
Tycho's system required fewer calculations and was consistent with all known measurements. Copernicus's was not consistent with observations.Tycho's system required roughly the same number of calculations as Copernicus’s, as it was basically Copernicus’s translated into Earths reference frame . Tycho fully accepted Copernican geometry, used Copernican planetary models, and where he did not explicitly do his own calculations, he used planetary tables based on Copernican models. Where Tycho was more accurate than Copernicus, it was through his greater observational accuracy, not any superiority of his model. Indeed, when he talks of his system, he notes that he has kept all the superior features of the Copernican system. Ironically, it was Tycho’s own measurements of the opposition of Mars in 1582 that showed that the Copernican model was in better agreement with the observed retrograde motion of Mars than the Ptolemaic model.
And yet Copernicus' model defied experimental verification, using the best astronomical apparatus of the time (Tycho's).Actually, that’s not true. There was a key test of the Ptolemic vs Copernican system and the Copernican system came through with flying colours. It was one of the key results that forced Tycho to reject the Ptolemaic system. However, that test tends to be ignored these days because of modern commentators focusing on the issue of stellar parallax.
We now know that stellar parallax could not be measured with instruments available then. It wasn’t obvious back then, and there were several attempts to measure the stellar parallax. Tycho established that the stellar parallax had to be less than 0.1 degree. However, this did not falsify the Copernican model as negligible parallax was an a priori feature of the Copernican system.
Tycho was well aware of this, and his argument was not that the lack of parallax showed that the Earth did not move, but that if the parallax was so small the distance between Saturn and the stellar sphere would have to be 700 times the distance between the Sun and Saturn. A provident creator would not be so wasteful of space and produce such asymmetry in his creation.
So we can see that the stellar parallax argument as used by Tycho is in the end not a scientific argument.
So what was the measurement that convinced Tycho to reject the Ptolemic system? Ironically, it was a parallax measurement. One of the predictions of the Copernican system was that Mars would be closer to Earth than the Sun at opposition; while in the Ptolemaic system Mars would always be more distant from the Sun. Tycho’s careful measurements of the parallax of Mars showed that Mars was closer to Earth than the Sun. Similar measurement of Venus’s parallax by Tycho also confirmed Copernican predictions. Copernicus was right, Ptolemy was wrong, and Tycho unhesitatingly rejects Ptolemy. But in the end Tycho rejects both Ptolemy and Copernicus.
My ultimate point about Tycho's rejection of Copernican theory was that applying principles of modern science sometimes leads one astray.Erm. Mr. Wallace. This is what you said:
I have a counter example, from science, fully described here, where Occam's razor fails...In this case, it was Tycho’s system failed the Occam’s razor test. It requires more assumptions than the Copernican system, introduces two centres of motion, introduces more problems with motions and whilst reproduces the retrograde motions of the planets, it no longer provides these motions as a natural consequence of the orbits of the planets. Altogether it is far less economical than the Copernican system and no longer explains the precession of the equinoxes and is affected by solar eccentricity (and this was pointed out at the time). Occam’s razor doesn’t fail, because Occam’s razor was not used to make the choice between the Copernican and Tychonian systems. What was the basis of Tycho’s rejection of the Copernican system? Let Tycho tell us in his own (translated) words.
Since all these results [parallax measurements of Mars and Venus] did not all agree with the Ptolemaic hypotheses I was urged afterward to put more and more confidence in the Copernican invention. The exceedingly absurd opinion that the Earth revolves uniformly and perpetually nevertheless made up a very great obstacle, and in addition the irrefutable authority of the Holy Scripture maintained the opposite view. [emphasis added]It wasn’t the principles of modern science that lead Tycho astray.
 The equant was seen as a particular drawback to Ptolemy’s system, if one wanted to explain planetary motion in terms of uniform circular motion, and Copernicus reformulation of planetary motion so that the equant was dispensed with. This was seen by contemporary astronomers and mathermaticians and a great benefit of the system. Tycho too saw the equant as something undesirable, and the great epicycles of Ptolemy as unparsimonius.
 Tycho got rid of Librations, but generally his scheme was Copernicus’s recast from Earth’s frame of reference.
 Ironically, Tycho’s system made the acceptance of the Copernican system easier. It made people familiar with the Copernican system, and smashed key sections of Aristotelian physics which have proved a barrier to acceptance of he Copernican system.
The Reception of Copernicus’s Heliocentric Theory 1973 ed Jerzy Dobryzcki, Reidle esp Chapter 3.
Copernicus, On the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres (translation AM Duncan 1976) Barnes & Nobel
The Copernican Revolution 1957, TS Kuhn Harvard University Press
The Book Nobody Read 2004, O Gingerich, Walker & Company
Hear Jupiter Singing
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Carnival of Space #98 is here.
Labels: carnival of space
It turns out I did far more astronomy over Easter than I had thought. Some of our Melbourne cousins came over, and the boys (well Young Adults and their Dad) were really interested. They got me to get out my telescope a couple of times.
The first night we were standing under the stars as the car was unpacked, when the Hubble Space Telescope and another satellite went over us close together. The next night I set up the Don, the 8" reflector, and we spent most of the night watching Saturn. Unlike the Earth Hour star party, the sky conditions were almost perfect, Saturn was beautiful and crisp, and not only could we see Titan, we could see Rhe and (just) Dione. I tried out a variety of lenses and Barlow combinations for the folks, and had a constant stream of people wanting to look. Well, Saturn IS fabulous, and the boys and adults just couldn't get enough.
Two nights later we did the Telescope thing again. Again Saturn was crisp, and this time Titan and Rhea were relatively close together, with Dione (just) visible on the other side. The Moon was just enough past full for there to be enough Luna craters to be worthwhile. Again, everyone was entranced by this, and EldestMaleNephew now has an image of the Moon on his mobile phone. The images above were all taken with my Canon IXUS "point and shoot" camera held up to the lens. Not bad really.
The Cousins are now back in Melbourne, and our boys miss their boys. We all had an excellent Easter, and had some good Astronomy to go with it. What adventures will we have next Easter?
Saturday, April 11, 2009
First Telescope Images of C/2009 G1 Ruan
C/2009 G1 in Stellarium (and Celestia, sort of)
I've put together the orbital elements for C/2009 G1 as files for Stellarium and Celestia. For Stellarium, add the section to the end of your ssytem.ini file (always back up). For Celestia, add the file to the extras folder. The only problem is that Celestia puts the comet nowhere near where it should go. I have no idea why and will try and fix this (fixed via Dimitri). If you want elements to add to a planetarium program like SkyMap, see this link to the MPC elements for planetarium programs.
name = C/2009G1
parent = Sun
radius = 100
oblateness = 0.0
halo = true
color = 1.0,1.0,1.0
tex_halo = star16x16.png
tex_map = nomap.png
coord_func = comet_orbit
orbit_TimeAtPericenter = 2454936.73194
orbit_PericenterDistance = 1.12993
orbit_Eccentricity = 1.0000
orbit_ArgOfPericenter = 173.823
orbit_AscendingNode = 120.657
orbit_Inclination = 108.091
lighting = false
albedo = 1
sidereal_period = 365.25
# C/2009 G1 Ruan
"C/2009 G1 Ruan" "Sol"
EllipticalOrbit # elements for epoch 2008 11 30
Epoch 2454936.5 # 2009-April-15.0930000
Radius 10.45 # Hn=12.50 Hn=14.10-2.5*log(Albedo)-5*log(Radius) Albedo=0.04
Orientation [ 90 0 0 1 ] # random value
RotationPeriod 15.613880 # random value
Obliquity 77.387310 # random value
EquatorAscendingNode 239.190649 # random value
The celestia file now works thanks to Dimitry (see comments)
Friday, April 10, 2009
NASA wants you ...
In the first sets of images, amateur astronomers found some known asteroids...Hey! I was one of those!
Readers, you may be able to help. The STEREO team is inviting the public to participate in the search by scrutinizing photos as they come in from the spacecraft.(Puts up hand) Pick Me!
Jiangao Ruan's comet (C/2009 G1) makes the News!
Comet C2009 G1 - Congratulations Jiangao Ruan
I have no idea whether Jiangao Ruan examines his STEREO images in the small hours of the morning, or looks at them over breakfast, as Comet Al does, but on Wednesday Jiangao sent a message to the stereo hunters group asking if a faint blob he saw transversing the STEREO H1b camera images was a known comet.
In quick time the stereohunter community swung into action, we confirmed the object, and in rapid time eliminated 209P/LINEAR, C/2008 T2 - Cardinal, P/2002 JN16, 2009 F6 (Yi-SWAN) and 446 Tisiphone, the only objects vaguely near the unknowns position, as candidates. This looked good as a new comet.
Karl Battams sent in a whole bunch of measured positions to the MPEC, and we waited. While we waited, we tried to work out where the comet was as seen by an observer from Earth, to alert the local telescopic community. Then the news came back, Jiangao's comet was named as C/2009 G1 (STEREO). And there was much rejoicing. To my knowledge this is only the second comet to be discovered first in the STEREO imager (as opposed to Comet Al's recovery of C/2003 K2), they are usually picked up in SWAN or SOHO first.
The announcement and orbital elements are here http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K09/K09G30.html and I have a printable PDF of the comets location here (yes, it's labeled G2 on my map, fumble fingers and no time to re-edit). The Comet is really magnitude 10 (and not likely to get much brighter), rather than the 12 indicated on my map (limitations of the way I put data into SkyMap). My PDF map also shows he location of Juno and 2009 G1 from the point of view of the H1b camera, and my (very bad) estimate of where the comet would be as seen from Earth),
Sadly the comet is currently in a very unfavorable position, very low to the eastern horizon in the morning, with the full Moon in the sky, this will make it hard to see for several days. It will get better. By the 18th of May, the comet will be 26 degrees above the horizon at astronomical twilight (as seen in Australia), with a last quarter Moon in the sky.
My animation of the comet is here, the comet is near the top right, and the asteroid Juno is near the bottom centre. Adam Hurcewicz has an animation here.
Congratulations again Jiangao!
Thursday, April 09, 2009
Shhsh! We're Hunting Comets
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
In Space, No one Can Hear you Blog
Hat tip, Greg Laden.
Monday, April 06, 2009
Now I can Play with the Big Toys
Sunday, April 05, 2009
The Best Laid Plans
Then the star party I was going to have with the boys was clouded out. Oh Well.
Still, the boys had great fun despite all the disasters.
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 4
All you need is a paper some pencils and, say a pair of binoculars. Galileo's scope wasn't much more powerful than this. It can be a bit difficult to hold binoculars and sketch at the same time, so use the back of a chair or table to stabilise the binoculars. Have a go, you will see how much fun it can be!
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 1
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 2
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 3
Carnival of Space #97 is here.
Labels: carnival of space
Saturday, April 04, 2009
I really am rubbish sometimes
So to cheer everyone up, here a link to the Best images of Saturn from Cassini.
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 3
Dust off that old telescope that has been lurking around in a cupboard gathering dust. What about recreating Galileo's adventures and explore the sky with binoculars or the old kids telescopes lying in the toybox.
You don't even really need telescopes or binoculars, just navigate your way around the sky and look for meteors or satellites. In Adelaide, at around 8:07 pm the Hubble Space telescope will glide through Gemini and underneath the Moon.
The Moon is in First Quarter phase, ideal for pointing telescopes at, and Saturn is high in the sky and is a big hit with everyone. Tonight (Saturday night) the Moon will be near the Beehive star cluster,which will make for nice viewing. You can even try and measure the movement of the Moon through the sky with reference to the Beehive.
Want to go out and do something special? Go to the Australian IYA site and look at the Calendar of Events. Check out your local astronomical societies or planetariums events. For example the Astronomical Society of South Australia is holding public viewings on Saturday. A planetarium Session at Uni SA, Mawsons Lakes, Saturday 4 April, 3pm, Admission: Adults $5, Children $3.50 and a public Viewing Night at the Grassed area, Black Forest, Forest Ave Saturday 4 April, 8:30pm, Admission: Adults $4, Children $1.
If you are up early in the morning, the moons of Jupiter are easily visible in binoculars (I was just looking at them before, and a satellite swept underneath Jupiter while I looked). And Venus returns to the morning sky, its dramatic crescent should be visible in binoculars.
So much to see! Have a great 100 hours of Astronomy.
Friday, April 03, 2009
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 2
If the skies are cloudy, at around 7:00 pm AEST the around the world in 80 telescopes webcast begins, so you can tune in to that.
UPDATE: The links at 100 hours of astronomy appear buggy. I've edited the link so it works now. Also, the live USTREAM video doesn't work for me, but the saved videos do. Pity the popup ads on the video are so annoying.
Thursday, April 02, 2009
Southern Skywatch April 2009 edition is now up!
The April edition of Southern Skywatch is now up. There is the return of Venus in the morning, the Moon near the Beehive cluster, the Lyrid meteor shower, and more.
Labels: southern skywatch
100 Hours of Astronomy - Day 1
But why just look? This also being the celebration of Galileo looking through a telescope, why not do some measurements?
Not complex measurements to be sure, but something simple. Like, how fast does the Moon move? All you need for this is a stick (a broom handle will do fine, or a camera tripod if you have one) and a ruler or protractor. Tape the ruler or protractor to one end of the stick and you are ready to go.
Go out and look at the Moon, and find a relatively bright star close by. Tonight this will be epsilon Geminorum, tomorrow kappa Geminourm and Saturday night delta Canceri and the beautiful Beehive cluster (see image above). Using the Ruler/ protractor measure the distance between the Moon and the star. You may need a torch with red cellophane wrapped around the business end to not destroy your eyesight and read the markings. Do this again every half hour for a couple of hours. How far does the Moon move?
We are also using a straight ruler, and the sky is curved (or rather the Moons path is a curve). How does this affect your measurements? Does the Moon move the same distance each night?
Update: If you have rubbish eyesight like mine make a home-made ruler with division in thick black texta. My attempt was foiled by cloud after my very first measurement.
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Carnival of Space #96 is here.
Labels: carnival of space